Piyush Gupta, the departing CEO of DBS Group, has negotiated an exceptionally generous compensation package, which will total S$17.6 million (US$13.2 million) in 2024. In light of the wider discussions surrounding executive compensation, this striking 57% increase from the prior year is especially noteworthy. As the head of the biggest bank in Singapore, Gupta has been instrumental in directing the company’s digital transformation, growing its clout throughout Asia, and guiding it to unprecedented financial success. But the question remains: does this amount of pay represent value, or does it highlight the growing divide between the typical worker and corporate leadership?
With a base salary of S$1.5 million, a cash bonus of S$6.6 million, and a sizeable S$9.4 million deferred award, his pay structure is radically different from many in the industry. Notably, penalties resulting from digital banking outages drastically decreased his S$11.2 million in 2023 earnings. Regulators intervened during a year of technological setbacks, which resulted in Gupta’s pay reduction. But in 2024, there was a dramatic change—DBS reported a net profit of an incredible S$10.3 billion, with a return on equity that peaked at 18%. These figures changed the perception of Gupta’s leadership completely.
Piyush Gupta’s Compensation and Career Breakdown
Attribute | Details |
---|---|
Full Name | Piyush Gupta |
Position | Former CEO of DBS Bank |
Total Salary (2024) | S$17.6 million (US$13.2 million) |
Base Salary | S$1.5 million |
Cash Bonus | S$6.6 million |
Deferred Award | S$9.4 million |
Special Award | S$2.5 million |
Salary Increase | 57% from 2023 |
Years as DBS CEO | 2009 – 2025 |
Successor | Tan Su Shan |
Bank’s Performance (2024) | Record net profit of S$10.3 billion |
Reference | Livemint |
The notable rise in Gupta’s salary is consistent with more general trends in executive compensation at financial institutions. Due in large part to performance-linked bonuses, Standard Chartered CEO Bill Winters was able to secure an incredible £10.7 million ($13.8 million). Jamie Dimon of JPMorgan Chase, on the other hand, made over $35 million, highlighting the substantial financial incentives associated with top international banks. These enormous payouts, however, raise crucial questions: should corporate executives be paid solely on the basis of profits, or should operational stability and accountability be given more weight?

Gupta’s exit marks the end of a period of revolutionary change for DBS. He transformed the institution’s customer interactions, streamlined operations, and raised profitability by putting a strong emphasis on digital banking. His approach to automation and AI-driven banking put DBS at the forefront of financial innovation, and during his tenure, the bank won numerous awards as the best digital bank in the world. DBS’s position as a significant force in Asian banking was further solidified by its entry into important markets like India and Indonesia.
His tenure at DBS was not without controversy, though. The Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) was forced to place restrictions on DBS’s expansion activities as a result of the 2023 digital banking outages, which raised regulatory scrutiny. That year, Gupta’s pay reduction represented a unique example of executive accountability. However, there are legitimate concerns about the drastic reversal in 2024, when his salary skyrocketed by 57%. Do executive salaries only serve to reward short-term profitability, or do they actually reflect long-term value?
With Tan Su Shan taking over as leader, there will be new opportunities in the future. Her ability to keep DBS moving forward will be closely examined because the banking sector is being shaped by inflation, economic volatility, and cyber security threats. The argument over corporate compensation plans will only get more heated if executive compensation keeps rising.
In many industries, the topic of the widening gap between employee and leadership compensation is becoming more and more popular. Although Gupta’s pay is a reflection of DBS’s excellent financial results, it also brings up issues of corporate responsibility and income inequality. Businesses frequently defend these pay disparities by emphasizing the strategic vision and influence of top executives, but to the general workforce, they can seem blatantly out of proportion.